More for less

August 04, 2008 3:37 PM

A TPA supporter emailed in a letters page recently (see below) that reveals a quite startling revelation from the Leader of East Herts. District Council.  In responding to a constituent’s letter decrying the high taxes and services in East Herts, Councillor Tony Jackson states the following:


“Three examples of issues that he suggests highlight EHDC’s “misappropriation of council tax”.  However, the first issue relates to a school – which is the responsibility of the county council; the second point is about highways – again, a county council issue; and the third about the post office – which is something in the domain of central government.  While these issues aren’t areas for which EHDC has direct responsibility…”


Talk about shifting the blame.  Nevertheless, although Councillor Jackson admits EHDC has very little responsibility, he’s still entitled to a ‘special responsibility’ salary of £27,022 on top of the £5,404 paid for by the taxpayer.


Perhaps on his admission that bodies elsewhere take responsibility for major policy areas, he should forego his ‘special responsibility’ salary?  Why not ask him? Anyone want to take odds that he doesn’t…


Easthertsletter

A TPA supporter emailed in a letters page recently (see below) that reveals a quite startling revelation from the Leader of East Herts. District Council.  In responding to a constituent’s letter decrying the high taxes and services in East Herts, Councillor Tony Jackson states the following:


“Three examples of issues that he suggests highlight EHDC’s “misappropriation of council tax”.  However, the first issue relates to a school – which is the responsibility of the county council; the second point is about highways – again, a county council issue; and the third about the post office – which is something in the domain of central government.  While these issues aren’t areas for which EHDC has direct responsibility…”


Talk about shifting the blame.  Nevertheless, although Councillor Jackson admits EHDC has very little responsibility, he’s still entitled to a ‘special responsibility’ salary of £27,022 on top of the £5,404 paid for by the taxpayer.


Perhaps on his admission that bodies elsewhere take responsibility for major policy areas, he should forego his ‘special responsibility’ salary?  Why not ask him? Anyone want to take odds that he doesn’t…


Easthertsletter

Latest Blogs:

TaxPayers' Alliance Icon

Who will defend the defenders?

12:03 PM 20, Sep 2017 Duncan Simpson

TaxPayers' Alliance Icon

What’s wrong with the all-ages graduate tax?

6:09 PM 18, Sep 2017 Jan Zeber

TaxPayers' Alliance Icon

Should taxpayers fund Zumba, facials and spas for the NHS?

4:02 PM 18, Sep 2017 Ben Ramanauskas

TaxPayers' Alliance Icon

Charges and fees and more charges and more fees

12:02 AM 06, Sep 2017 Duncan Simpson

TaxPayers' Alliance Icon

Is PFI profit really a waste of taxpayers’ money?

12:05 PM 31, Aug 2017 Jan Zeber