MP questions £450,000 paid out to absent council services director

January 26, 2010 3:31 PM

According to the Birmingham Mail, a city council service director was paid £200,000pa to stay at home for two years, remaining on gardening leave even after an allegation against him was dismissed.


Birmingham City Council City MP Khalid Mahmood is calling for a probe into how Berkley Broomes was paid his enormous salary for so long, particularly after he was cleared of any wrongdoing. Mr. Broomes was also paid £50,000 in compensation.


The Adults and Communities directorate where Mr. Broomes worked is currently in financial crisis according to the newspaper, with many care home staff facing redundancy.


The Labour MP is quoted as saying, “This is a ludicrous waste of public money and in the end we will all be paying for it through our council taxes”.


This costly error seems to have come about via a combination of an oversight and a long, laborious, bureaucratic investigation. When an extremely highly paid member of staff is suspended on full pay the clock should start ticking and those involved in any inquiry should automatically be under some pressure to clear up the matter as swiftly and efficiently as is possible. For this to have rumbled on for two whole years, costing £400,000 (and then culminating in compensation) is entirely unacceptable and indicative of creaky inadequate council mechanisms for dealing with such complaints.


According to the Birmingham Mail, a city council service director was paid £200,000pa to stay at home for two years, remaining on gardening leave even after an allegation against him was dismissed.


Birmingham City Council City MP Khalid Mahmood is calling for a probe into how Berkley Broomes was paid his enormous salary for so long, particularly after he was cleared of any wrongdoing. Mr. Broomes was also paid £50,000 in compensation.


The Adults and Communities directorate where Mr. Broomes worked is currently in financial crisis according to the newspaper, with many care home staff facing redundancy.


The Labour MP is quoted as saying, “This is a ludicrous waste of public money and in the end we will all be paying for it through our council taxes”.


This costly error seems to have come about via a combination of an oversight and a long, laborious, bureaucratic investigation. When an extremely highly paid member of staff is suspended on full pay the clock should start ticking and those involved in any inquiry should automatically be under some pressure to clear up the matter as swiftly and efficiently as is possible. For this to have rumbled on for two whole years, costing £400,000 (and then culminating in compensation) is entirely unacceptable and indicative of creaky inadequate council mechanisms for dealing with such complaints.


Latest Blogs:

TaxPayers' Alliance Icon

Guildford Action Day

10:44 AM 24, Jul 2017 Shahmir Sanni

TaxPayers' Alliance Icon

BBC Pay Day Dismay

3:58 PM 19, Jul 2017 Katherine Harvey

TaxPayers' Alliance Icon

BBC is right to publish salaries of its biggest stars

12:25 PM 19, Jul 2017 Harry Davis

TaxPayers' Alliance Icon

Flop Gun

4:19 PM 18, Jul 2017 Taylor Boyce

TaxPayers' Alliance Icon

Leicester Action Day

5:00 PM 17, Jul 2017 James Price