NHS Spending: The Facts

December 02, 2014 10:01 AM

There was much talk this weekend about an extra £2 billion of funding for the NHS. Healthcare certainly has become a major issue in the general election campaign – that means a bidding war is underway, with politicians from all parties pledging more money without really explaining where it will come from.

All too often politicians measure their performance on how much money they can spend rather than what taxpayers get in return.

And this weekend’s row is particularly unedifying, considering just a few weeks ago the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges highlighted potential savings of £2bn through better use of medicine, tests, operating theatres, and hospital beds.

The NHS appears to have been exempted from the efficiency savings the chancellor has demanded from Whitehall departments and local authorities.

And the annual row has over the imminent winter crisis has broken out, just as it did in 2013. We shouldn’t be in a position where people’s lives are at risk because of a change in the season, but things are improving: it recently emerged that last year saw the lowest ever number of winter deaths since records began in 1950.

Politicians should consider the following before committing more taxpayers’ money:

A very brief history of NHS spending

Historically speaking, the NHS has received large, real term budget increases for a couple of years in a row, and then had a few years of lower spending. This changed around the turn of the century when the NHS was handed big budget increases throughout the 2000s. Between 1979 and 1997, NHS spending increased in real terms by an average of 3.2 per cent per year. Between 1999 and 2008, this figure was 6.3 per cent per year. NHS spending has been pretty much frozen in real terms under the current government.

Sound familiar?

Despite the unprecedented budget increases, news outlets were inundated with stories about cash crises and impending financial disaster:

Where did the money go?

“Over the last ten years, there has been significant real growth in the resources going into the NHS, most of it funding higher staff pay and increases in headcount. The evidence shows that productivity in the same period has gone down, particularly in hospitals.”

Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, 17 December 2010

Overall, there was a 17.3 per cent increase in the number of full-time equivalent staff between 2003 and 2010 in England, reaching 1.17 million in September 2010.

NHS Staff numbers (full-time equivalent, England only)

AW_Table_1.pngGeneral practitioners were perhaps the biggest beneficiaries of the funding boost:
  • Between 2002-03 and 2005-06 the average pay of a GMS and PMS practice partner in England increased from £72,011 in 2002-03 to £113,614 in 2005-06 – a 58 per cent increase
  • GPs are working on average seven hours less per week than in 1992
  • By January 2005, less than 10 per cent of GP practices delivered out-of-hours care under the GMS contract. Out of hours is defined as the period from 6.30pm to 8.00am

Pay freeze?

The Chancellor has unable to control NHS pay effectively. Staff have still been moving up the “Agenda for Change” pay scales meaning that on average, NHS staff pay in England has increased by 9.4 per cent in cash terms since 2009.

Pay rises have been particularly benefited managers, locum doctors and those working in administrative roles.

Mean annual basic pay per full-time equivalent (12 month period ending in June of each year)

AW_Table_2.pngInvestment?

The prioritisation of pay and headcount meant little was invested in medical technologies. Look at the increase in the number of MRI units per million of population between 2000 and 2011 in some countries similar to the UK.

AW_Table_3.png

 

Now we have fewer MRI scanners per head of population than Slovenia, Estonia, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Greece has four times as many.

We have fewer CT scanners per head of population than every country in the OECD apart from Hungary and Mexico. Chile and Poland have more and Estonia has twice as many.

Something for the Chancellor to bear in mind

George Osborne, Ed Balls and others should heed the advice of Dame Julie Moore, the Chief Executive if the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham:

“The NHS at its best is amongst the best in the world. However, it is patchy,” she says. “Putting more money in has sometimes actually led to some of the problems, in that you’ve artificially propped up some of the hospitals that really are not sustainable.”

Do you like this page?

commented 2014-12-02 22:00:25 +0000 · Flag
Good to see the TPA coming out against the internal market and all the managers, accountants and lawyers being used to roll it out.
commented 2014-12-02 17:57:31 +0000 · Flag
Agree totally, for all the money put in salaries took up the most. I no longer believe that nurses and staff are poorly paid. But I do know some trusts are unsustainable in present form. My local NHS trust is Mid Yorkshire Trust is 3 hospitals, 2 used to be productive and came in on budget or even a small surplus. But the largest one, Pinderfields was never like this. It has now destroyed one, and is in process of destroying the other. And its all happened between 1997 and 2010, and is still unable to stay in budget.