The Sentinel reports today on the cost of parking provision for Stoke-On-Trent City Council workers after the West Midlands TaxPayers’ Alliance received a Freedom of Information response revealing that public sector parking permits were costing local taxpayers’ nearly £700,000.
This is almost as much as the astronomically expensive refurbishments at the council!
Stoke even managed to trump Birmingham City Council who spent £250,000 less despite employing considerably more workers.
Whilst everyone else has to pay extortionate rates for city centre car parking, these workers get to park right up next to their place of work completely gratis. As always it is one rule for them and a completely different one for the rest of us.
Just another instance of this badly flawed council needlessly leaking more of taxpayers’ money…
Let’s get this straight.
People who think that the deep cleaning is a gimmick, at best:
The Lancet medical journal.
The cleaning contractors hired to do the deep clean.
People who think it is a good idea:
Gordon Brown – briefly an academic and then a journalist but, for most of his life, a full-time Labour politician.
Alan Johnson – moved into politics from a job at the postal union.
Sure enough, the deep cleans are going ahead at a cost of £50 million pounds that could be spent on the day-to-day cleaning that the contractors say would be more effective. Another day in our politically managed public services.
This morning a group of dedicated low-tax campaigners descended on Barnet County Courthouse to support TPA activist Rick Stratton in his bid to get justice over his council tax bills. Rick’s case revolves around Hertsmere Council demanding council tax on a property they declared as “unfit for human habitation”, a sum running into the thousands of pounds Rick just can’t afford. I doubt that even our over-paid council bureaucrats could afford a lump sum payment were they issued it, despite how overpaid they are. But, in the current system, it’s one rule for them and one rule for the taxpayer. The Council declared the property unfit for human habitation and yet still want thousands of pounds in tax from Rick.
Our morning began in a rather sinister fashion. Literally as soon as we left the station, we were met by a couple of police officers (see left). Apparently they got a tip off from someone about the protest and it ‘necessitated’ a continuous police presence throughout. What rubbish! The police surely have better things to do than marshal a dozen activists politely protesting against the injustices handed out by the greedy state. Needless to say, passers by were less than amused that we were being monitored by the police, which brought us even more attention and support.
In another shocking twist, Rick told us after his case was heard that the court had switched judges at the last moment, apparently aware of the protest outside. As they gave no reason why, we can only assume the first judge would have seen sense and rectified the huge bill imposed by Hertsmere Council. Moreover, the court authorities barred a journalist from the Hendon Times from sitting in on the proceedings. So first they had the police on permanent surveillance of our protest, next they conducted the proceedings in secret. Some democracy…
Rick here explains the result, and it isn’t pleasant:
So, pay your council tax, year on year – no matter how much it goes up – or the council take your house!! It’s that simple and ruthless.
On a brighter note, all throughout the morning passers-by came to join our protest, one gentleman demanding to hold a placard in support of lower taxes. An elderly couple joined us for around an hour, boosting our numbers and showing that although a TPA protest may start off as a humble event, it will end with more people participating, taking notice and spreading the word for lower taxes.
By the end of the morning we had distributed well over 250 TPA leaflets, as well as attracting enough car ‘honks’ to show overwhelming support for lower taxes. The politicos in Westminster may think tax cuts aren’t popular. But they should do what I did today and go and meet the people and get their views. The people are saying with one loud, clear voice that they are overtaxed and are becoming increasingly impatient as our politicians fail to act.
But it is one thing knowing the virtue of our arguments; we still could have had more people out in support. Never forget the value our action has to our other activists. Yes we are always promoting the low-tax cause. But we are also standing with people the state is trying to bleed dry. There’s a human element to our action that reinforces our campaigns. Put simply: tax cuts ease the burden the state imposes on ordinary people who just want the government to back off and let them live their lives.
Here Rick tells us why you should get involved in our campaign. If you want to organise a protest or leaflet action day in your borough, contact me today so we can prepare and invite people to come along. So until the next time we take to the streets to build the majority for lower taxes, I shall leave you with Rick’s wise words…
For taxpayers the New Year has brought no good news on the Crock. Brown and Darling are still dithering in the headlights, while we remain on the hook for over £50bn of loans and guarantees. Hopes of a cost-free exit diminish by the day.
There is now no chance of the Virgin or Olivant "bids" working for us- they have been unable to raise the £10-15bn they claimed, and as we’ve blogged before, that wouldn’t have been enough to pay off taxpayers anyway.
In an attempt to bridge the gap, Goldman Sachs was hired by the Treasury to come up with alternative finance, but if the leaks are to be believed, they’ve failed. Restructuring the £25bn taxpayer loan as a bond issue, which would then be sold to private investors, would only work with a taxpayer guarantee, or a prohibitively expensive "credit wrap" from a commercial insurer. Which gets us precisely nowhere.
Meanwhile the raw meat eating hedge fund players who bought up c 20% of NR’s equity stock back in September and October, are threatening to sue us when we nationalise the bank without compensation. They reckon we should pay them around £4 per share, which is the Bank’s notional book value. Just to highlight how ludicrous that is, here’s the share price chart:
They’re also attempting to stop the existing NR directors "succumbing to political pressure", in particular by selling off assets to repay the Bank of England loans.
And on that point, the Rock last week did indeed sell a £2.2bn mortgage portfolio to Tony Blair’s new employer, JP Morgan. These were well secured "equity release mortgages", and among the Bank’s most high quality assets. Yes, they made a £50m profit against their book value, but we can understand why the shareholders are concerned they may have been sold off cheap.
Taxpayers should be concerned about exactly the same thing. As we all surely understand by now, the Bank only remains in business because of our loans and guarantees. And when we finally have to pick up the pieces, we do not want to find all the Canalettos and the Georgian silver have already been flogged in a fire sale.
The end-game is now clear. It’s a state managed work-out. Darling has to nationalise the Bank without compensation, repay depositors, sell off the assets, and close down operations (as set out eg by Anatole Kaletsky two months ago).
One reason he’s been holding back is that he doesn’t want the embarrassment of adding NR’s £100bn liabilities to the National Debt. According to this morning’s Telegraph, he’s therefore pursuing some kind of partial nationalisation.
That would be a serious mistake. Not only are the National Debt figures a fiction anyway (see many previous blogs), we’ve had more than enough confusion already, which has cost taxpayers a fortune. Simplicity, transparency, and tough decisions are what’s needed now.
We learned over the weekend at least he’s appointed someone to run the nationalised bank- ex-Lloyds head Ron Sandler. So now he just needs to pull the trigger.
And the longer he leaves it, the more it’s going to cost us.
Quango Advantage West Midlands have decided to recruit a new bureaucrat to their ranks at a cost of up to £37,000.
The ‘Cultural Manager’ will manage the ‘Cultural Programme’ which includes the ambiguous ‘Cultural Olympiad’ – something I’m sure we won’t know how we lived without…
There’s little doubt that all the ‘relationship building’ this involves will be too much for one person to cope with alone, and so we can most probably add the extra costs of assistants and administrators to the initial £37,000.
The job description states:
This certainly seems to herald more strategy meetings and costly consultations AWM-style, with little to no involvement from the general public.
The West Midlands is already swamped with quangos who all claim to be working to a cultural agenda, and at this rate they will be competing with one another! Culture West Midlands, Tourism West Midlands, Screen West Midlands, Arts Council England: West Midlands, MLA West Midlands…etc etc.
Another ‘Cultural Manager’ is surely the last thing this region needs?