Union Members' Interests or Personal Gain?

June 07, 2010 6:25 PM

The story of Arthur Scargill – former President of the National Union of Mineworkers – still having a union funded London flat has brought to light more revelations about the culture of union management.

According to the BBC payments for the flat amounts to thousands of pounds every year.  A motion will be put to the union’s annual conference later this month over whether funding for the flat should continue; a motion which Scargill calls "complete nonsense".  He stated:
"Every one of my predecessors has been allowed to remain in their properties following retirement.

"There are many people who have two homes. I have a rented property which I shall cease to have when I die and a property which I bought with my own money in Yorkshire."

Indeed, Scargill is correct that union leaders are given plenty of luxuries and the TPA has some up and coming research, which shows that many union chief executives are taking home six figure salaries every year. With union fat cats pocketing such hefty pay packets and Scargill’s insistence of being entitled to a Barbican flat indefinitely, one has to question if the union leaders are in the business of representing the interests of their own members or personal prestige.

BA Chief Executive Willie Walsh has argued that the ongoing row at BA is being prolonged because a faction of the Unite union - British Airlines Stewards and Stewardesses Association (Bassa) – is hell-bent “on preserving the appearance of their own importance.” And refuses to recognize the ‘agreement in principal’ with BA management. Meanwhile the professional reputation of BA – the thing that provides BA employees with the best perks in the airline industry – is going down the drain.  Is that another example of unions putting their own interests ahead of their members?The story of Arthur Scargill – former President of the National Union of Mineworkers – still having a union funded London flat has brought to light more revelations about the culture of union management.

According to the BBC payments for the flat amounts to thousands of pounds every year.  A motion will be put to the union’s annual conference later this month over whether funding for the flat should continue; a motion which Scargill calls "complete nonsense".  He stated:
"Every one of my predecessors has been allowed to remain in their properties following retirement.

"There are many people who have two homes. I have a rented property which I shall cease to have when I die and a property which I bought with my own money in Yorkshire."

Indeed, Scargill is correct that union leaders are given plenty of luxuries and the TPA has some up and coming research, which shows that many union chief executives are taking home six figure salaries every year. With union fat cats pocketing such hefty pay packets and Scargill’s insistence of being entitled to a Barbican flat indefinitely, one has to question if the union leaders are in the business of representing the interests of their own members or personal prestige.

BA Chief Executive Willie Walsh has argued that the ongoing row at BA is being prolonged because a faction of the Unite union - British Airlines Stewards and Stewardesses Association (Bassa) – is hell-bent “on preserving the appearance of their own importance.” And refuses to recognize the ‘agreement in principal’ with BA management. Meanwhile the professional reputation of BA – the thing that provides BA employees with the best perks in the airline industry – is going down the drain.  Is that another example of unions putting their own interests ahead of their members?

Latest Blogs:

TaxPayers' Alliance Icon

We're hiring a Campaign Manager - Digital

11:37 AM 16, Jan 2017 The TaxPayers' Alliance

TaxPayers' Alliance Icon

Increases in precepts are not the answer

3:30 PM 13, Jan 2017 James Price

TaxPayers' Alliance Icon

We must all stand up for a free press

10:39 AM 06, Jan 2017 Dia Chakravarty

TaxPayers' Alliance Icon

Want to be our new Policy Analyst?

12:52 PM 05, Jan 2017 The TaxPayers' Alliance

TaxPayers' Alliance Icon

Are rail fares too high?

3:38 PM 03, Jan 2017 Alex Wild